Colorado Springs 1:2 San Antonio Davis Legacy 1:2 Project 51O Santafé Wanderers 5:2 Sunflower State GFI 2:0 Brazos Valley Houston Sur 0:2 AHFC Royals Lubbock Matadors 1:1 McKinney Chupacabras Minneapolis City 3:1 RKC Rockford Raptors 3:2 Edgewater Castle Charlottesville Blues 0:3 Lionsbridge Mississippi Brilla 3:3 Memphis 901 Corpus Christi 0:0 Alta West Texas 2:1 Fort Worth Vaqueros CAP 0:0 BOA Caravel 1:6 Estrella South Africa 1:0 South Korea Spokane Velocity 2:1 Westchester SC Marin 3:3 Sportivo San Juan Lonestar 1:1 San Antonio FC 2 Czechia 0:3 Mexico Los Angeles FC II 1:0 Minnesota United II Academica 2:3 San Francisco City Ventura County Fusion 5:1 Seahorses Stars FC 5:2 City SC Khovd 1:6 Hunters Khoromkhon 2:4 Ulaangom City Sport Academy Kairat 5:0 Khan Tengri Yelimay Semey 2 0:3 Turan Turkistan FC Botosani 1:0 Dunfermline Al Nejmeh 1:0 Tadamon Sour Aktobe Jas 3:1 Arys

The World Cup 2026 Group E match between Ecuador and Germany at the New York New Jersey Stadium ended with a big debate. Leroy Sane scored for Germany, but many people think the goal should not have counted. The reason? A dangerous play by German player Alexander Pavlovic just before the goal.

What Happened in the Build-Up

Right before Sane scored, Pavlovic lifted his boot very high while trying to control the ball. This high boot came close to an Ecuador player’s head. According to soccer rules, a high boot that endangers an opponent is a foul. The referee did not call it, and the goal stood.

  • Pavlovic’s boot was above waist height and near the opponent’s face.
  • The move was considered reckless and dangerous by experts.
  • The referee let play continue, which led to the goal.

Why Experts Say It Was the Wrong Call

World Cup pundits, including former players, explained why the goal should have been disallowed. They pointed out that the rules are clear: any action that puts an opponent in danger, like a high boot, must be stopped. By not blowing the whistle, the referee made a mistake that changed the game.

  • The high boot was an example of "endangering the opponent."
  • It should have been a foul for Germany, not a goal.
  • The decision hurt Ecuador’s chances in a tight group match.

What This Means for the Tournament

This controversial call has sparked a lot of talk about referee decisions in big games. For Ecuador, it was a tough break that could affect their path in the tournament. For Germany, the goal helped them, but the debate shows how one call can change everything. Fans and experts agree: the goal should not have counted, and the rules need to be followed more carefully.

Sign In

Sign in to save favourites, sync across devices, and more.

Don't have an account? Create one